Tuesday , September 19 2017
Home | News | Appeals Court Upholds Fraud Charges Against Paxton
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, accompanied by his wife, Angela, left, speaks to the media after leaving the Fifth Court of Criminal Appeals on May 12, 2016 in Dallas. | Photo by Robert Hart for The Texas Tribune

Appeals Court Upholds Fraud Charges Against Paxton

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has lost his latest bid for dismissal of the securities fraud charges he faces.

A Dallas appeals court on Wednesday upheld the indictments, which accuse Paxton of misleading investors in private business dealings before he took office as the top lawyer for Texas. Paxton’s side asked the 5th Court of Appeals last month to overturn a lower court’s decision not to dismiss the case against him.

“We’re very pleased with the ruling,” said Kent Schaffer, one of the special prosecutors in the case. “We’re looking forward to trial, and we will be preparing for trial.”

Paxton’s team noted that the appeals court “did not hold that Mr. Paxton’s main claims were without merit, rather were premature at this stage of the proceedings.” In a statement, Paxton lawyer Bill Mateja also said the team was considering whether to appeal the decision to the highest criminal court in Texas, the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Schaffer and the other special prosecutor in the case, Brian Wice, issued a statement noting how quickly it took the court to reach a unanimous decision — three weeks after oral argument — and said they “are confident that the Court of Criminal Appeals will reject Mr. Paxton’s next round of appeals as surely and as swiftly as the court of appeals did today.”

Paxton has pleaded not guilty to the charges, which were handed up last year by a Collin County grand jury. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission brought a similar case against him earlier this year.

During a hearing before the court last month, Paxton’s lawyers most prominently argued that the grand jury that indicted him was improperly selected. The court rejected that argument in its ruling Wednesday.

“After reviewing the record and, in particular, the process used by the district judge, we conclude the complained-of method of selecting the grand jury is not a complaint that would render the grand jury illegally formed,” Chief Justice Carolyn Wright wrote.

Author:  – The Texas Tribune

The Texas Tribune is a nonpartisan, nonprofit media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them – about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues

About The Texas Tribune

The Texas Tribune is a nonpartisan, nonprofit media organization that informs Texans — and engages with them – about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.

Check Also

Unique Bracero Summit Focusing on World War II-era Agreement Starts Friday

The National Trust for Historic Preservation and The University of Texas at El Paso will …

One comment

  1. So, let’s hope whoever is prosecuting this will move forward rapidly, and maybe we can get rid of at least one of the people who give Texas a bad name.

Victor&Charlie728