window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'UA-29484371-30');
Wednesday , August 12 2020
Mountains 728
TRLA_728
Covid-19 Fund 728
ENTERPRISE 728
Utep Football Generic 728
Spring Training 728
PBP_728
EMERGENCE MINDFUL 728.90
john overall 728×90
Elizabeth 728
Emergence June 11 – Sep 11, 2020 728
Home | Opinion | Letters to the Editor | Letter to the Editor: Deny EP Electric purchase by JP Morgan, Make EPE a City Utility
Photo courtesy Google Earth

Letter to the Editor: Deny EP Electric purchase by JP Morgan, Make EPE a City Utility

The purchase El Paso Electric (EPE) by JP Morgan’s Infrastructure Investment Fund (IFF) should not be allowed by the Public Utilities Commission of Texas (PUCT). Approval hinges upon the sale being in the “public interest” of the citizens it serves. As a part of the IIF, the decisions of EPE will be based upon maximizing value for the holders of the fund rather than the people of West Texas and New Mexico served by EPE.

A publicly owned utility, similar to that of Austin Energy, would make EPE a department held within the City of El Paso. City utility profits, rather than paying shareholder dividends, can be allocated to subsidize solar for low income homeowners, electrify public transportation, and reduce EPE’s reliance on power from natural gas.

JP Morgan, in its Climate Change investment brief, highlights and proposes natural gas plants as a strategy to provide additional electricity during peak summer demand, when temperatures are highest, the A/C is on, and electricity prices spike.

This may be prudent for JP Morgan given its multinational investment portfolio, but the immense solar potential of El Paso makes it the best choice to cool the summer heat. Matching solar energy supply with the high electricity demand and price summer will lower consumer costs and reduce the reliance on natural gas with its health, safety, and climate concerns.

Utilities have long been considered “natural monopolies” where one utility serves a specific area and is regulated by state PUCs to ensure there is no manipulation of price that could harm consumers. The monopolies historically were allowed because it made little sense to spend the high startup costs of building large centralized power plants and transmission infrastructure multiple times.

The decentralized and disrupting force of solar makes the natural monopoly model unnecessary and empowers citizens to produce their own electricity while forwarding notions of equity and environmental justice and reducing the power of corporate utilities. Additionally, solar panel prices have come down significantly in the last decade, now consistently beating new natural gas production in terms of electricity price.

The future of energy production is renewable, locally empowered, decentralized, and disruptive. The sale of EPE to JP Morgan would be step in the wrong direction. A city-owned utility focused on solar production would give a voice to the people of West Texas and Southern New Mexico and best serve the public interest.

Ryan Brown

Former El Paso resident now living in Austin.

***

El Paso Herald-Post welcomes all views and viewpoints.  To have your opinion heard, submit your letter to news@epheraldpost.com

About Guest Columnist

Guest Columnists are residents who feel so strongly about a news event, a story or some other issue, that they decided to put their thoughts to paper - or computer screens. Or they are writers who have made their work available via other channels and we feature their work here, with permission. If you'd like to submit a column, please contact us at news@epheraldpost.com

Check Also

Letter to the Editor: Protect the Great Neighborhood of Duranguito 

As a Dane I have had the privilege – since 1978 – to visit the …

Spring Training 728
john overall 728×90
Emergence June 11 – Sep 11, 2020 728
Mountains 728
Get Shift Done 728
TRLA_728
EMERGENCE MINDFUL 728.90
PBP_728
ENTERPRISE 728
Elizabeth 728
Covid-19 Fund 728
Utep Football Generic 728