window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('js', new Date()); gtag('config', 'UA-29484371-30');
Monday , May 20 2019
shark 728×90
Bordertown Undergroun Show 728
Nobleza728
JustLikeThat728
Amy’s Astronomy
Soccer/Volleyball 728
STEP 728
ORDT_728
Home | Tag Archives: texas education

Tag Archives: texas education

Op-Ed: The high stakes of being a third grader

Dear School District A:

Your third-grade students performed well on the STAAR test. Here’s more money.

 

Dear School District B:

Your third-grade students struggled on STAAR. You get nothing.

-*-

That’s outcomes-based funding in a nutshell, and it’s the latest trendy policy proposal being considered by lawmakers in Austin.

Let’s be very clear: Under these proposals, the state would partially fund our schools based on the performance of 8-year-olds on a single high-stakes test given on a single day.

And one of those tests — the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) — is facing increasing scrutiny at the Capitol and across the state. Texas MonthlyThe New York Times, and other media shined a light on multiple academic research studies revealing that the STAAR is actually measuring students against standards for readers one or two grade levels higher than the test-takers.

The name “outcomes funding,” and other equally rosy-sounding labels used by proponents — like performance-based funding, or incentives-based funding — are misleading. A more appropriate name, based on what is being measured, rewarded and punished, is “test-based funding.” Whatever you call it, this type of funding mechanism would weaken Texas public schools and students — especially those who need the most help.

The theory behind test-based funding is that school leaders, teachers and students will respond to a financial incentive to improve student performance. It implies schools already have the resources they need to meet the needs of all students. Yet the unfolding school finance debate in Austin surely suggests otherwise. The proof? House Bill 3, which infuses public schools with significant additional state revenue, primarily targeted toward our neediest students, passed the Texas House by a 148-1 margin.

It’s true that outcomes incentives may work in business. They may even work in higher education settings where states provide funding based on course completion. But outcomes-based funding policy in the K-12 arena, where students’ achievement levels on a single standardized test are used to fund schools, is almost nonexistent. And, where it’s been tried, it’s largely failed.

Arizona passed legislation in 2017 awarding additional funding to the top 10% of its schools based on performance on math and reading standardized tests. The results after two years indicate significant inequities between wealthy and poor campuses, even though economically disadvantaged students are eligible for more money.

The Fordham Institute found that Ohio’s outcomes-based funding system, with its questionable performance metrics for bonus pay, be overhauled or scrapped.

Simply put, research has not shown that allocation of scarce resources to chase a single measure generates better outcomes than a broad measure of accountability. The evidence just isn’t there. Texas voters overwhelmingly reject it, too.

In January, Raise Your Hand Texas polled likely 2020 Texas voters, asking, “Do you support or oppose increases in public school funding tied to student performance on state standardized tests, where higher test scores mean more money for a school campus?”

Seventy-eight percent of respondents opposed test-based funding. Whether in a poll or on election day, that level of response is known as a landslide.

Our schools should not be funded based on the performance of a third grader on one day in May, especially on a test with as many trouble signs as STAAR. The state’s school finance system is not and should not be punitive. It should not create a culture of winners and losers. All Texas students deserve a fair shot, through an adequate and equitable school finance system.

Rather than dwelling on unproven, unpopular funding approaches based on a possibly flawed high-stakes test, the state should fund programs that use tools to benchmark and track student needs and growth. This allows a more personalized, data-driven model of instruction, and that’s a meaningful way to achieve better outcomes for all Texas students.

***

Director of government relations, Raise Your Hand Texas

 

 

***

Disclosure: Raise Your Hand Texas has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune’s journalism. Find a complete list of them here.

***

The El Paso Herald-Post welcomes all guest columns, open letters, letters to the Editor and analysis pieces for publication, to submit a piece or for questions regarding guidelines, please email us at news@epheraldpost.com

Texas grades school districts on an A-F scale. Explore your district’s grades here.

The Texas Public Schools Explorer, The Texas Tribune’s comprehensive education tool, was updated this week to include data from the 2017-18 school year. The explorer now also includes the state’s new A-F ratings for school districts, which were released last year.

Last August, Texas gave school districts their first official grades, rating each district on an A-F scale. It’s a change from the previous pass/fail rating system, and has been the focus of a years-long debate over how to best help parents weigh schooling options for their children without relying too much on standardized test scores.

State officials have argued that the new A-F grading system is more transparent. But some educators and advocates disagree, saying that lumping multiple metrics into a single letter grade is misleading to parents and unfair to schools.

Lawmakers made final changes to the new rating system — which gives districts a letter grade in three categories: student achievement, school progress and closing the gaps — during the 2017 legislative session.

Districts receive an individual grade in each category based on metrics including how well students perform on standardized tests and whether students are ready for college. The three individual grades are then used to calculate an overall grade.

Individual schools will not receive their official letter grades until August. Currently, their official ratings are based on the previous accountability system — with designations including “met standard,” “met alternative standard” and “improvement required.

The state released numerical grades for each school, which can be translated to letter grades and can be found on this Texas Education Agency website.

The explorer uses data provided by the Texas Education Agency to calculate information on the state’s 1,200 districts and 8,759 public schools, including graduation rates, demographic breakdowns, test scores and teacher experience and salary data.

To use the explorer, search a district or school name. Don’t know the exact name of a school or district? Start typing and the search bar will auto-populate until you find it.

Author: CATHERINE MARFIN The Texas Tribune

Bordertown Undergroun Show 728
ORDT_728
shark 728×90
Amy’s Astronomy
Soccer/Volleyball 728
JustLikeThat728
Nobleza728
STEP 728